Michael Savage proves KOSOVO is SERBIA!

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5y6m7_michael-savage-proves-kosovo-is-ser_news

 The Truth About Kosovo and Metohija (KOSMET) 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vT_WwgaOfbg

—-

Dr. Michael Savage is a multimedia icon in the conservative movement, heard by 10 million listeners a week on “The Michael Savage Show,” and syndicated across the U.S. in over 300 markets. He is also the author of 25 books, including four New York Times bestsellers. In 2007, his media presence and profile earned him the coveted “Freedom of Speech Award” from Talkers Magazine.

——

Kosovo’s PM ‘head of organ ring’

Kosovo’s Mafia: How the US and allies ignore allegations of organized crime at the highest levels of a new democracy

———–

America’s Veterans: The Serbian People Are Heroes!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5CXope9ncI&feature=related

Advertisements

22 Responses to Michael Savage proves KOSOVO is SERBIA!

  1. Varagić Nikola каже:

    Michael Savage Talks To A Serbian Woman About War On Terror

    http://vodpod.com/watch/5630789-michael-savage-talks-to-a-serbian-woman-about-war-on-terror

  2. Varagić Nikola каже:

  3. Varagić Nikola каже:

  4. Varagić Nikola каже:

  5. Varagić Nikola каже:

  6. Varagić Nikola каже:

    THE CHRISTIAN TERRORIST: THE GREATEST ENEMY IS THE ENEMY WITHIN

    BY MICHAEL SAVAGE

    IN THE AFTERMATH OF THE NORWAY MASSACRE, TALKING HEADS ARE TELLING US THAT THE CRIMES OF THE ANDERS BEHRING BREIVIK ARE SIMPLY THE PRODUCT OF INSANITY. TODAY HIS LAWYER CLAIMED THAT HIS BELEIFS ARE INSANE. EVERYONE IS CLAIMING THAT THIS HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH HIS CHRISTIANITY. THE LEPRECHAUN ON FOX NEWS EVEN SAID, “BREIVIK IS NOT A CHRISTIAN.”

    BUT THE TERRIBLE TRUTH OF THE MATTER IS THAT BREIVIK IS A CHRISTIAN. HE LOUDLY PROCLAIMS HIS CHRISTIANITY. HE CALLS HIMSELF “100% CHRISTIAN” IN HIS MANIFESTO. HE CLAIMS TO BE A MEMBER OF THE “KNIGHTS TEMPLAR,” WHICH IS PRESUMABLY A REINVENTION OF THE 12TH CENTURY CHRISTIAN ORGANIZATION WHICH PARTICIPATED IN THE CRUSADES. WHEN HE JUSTIFIES HIS VIOLENCE, HE QUOTES THE BIBLE – LUKE, MATTHEW, ISAIAH, DANIEL, 1 CORINTHIANS, 2 CORINTHIANS, EXODUS, SAMUEL, JUDGES, AND PSALMS. THE MANIFESTO SAYS “GOD WILL ANOINT YOU WITH HIS POWER TO GO INTO BATTLE,” AND “GOD CAN BE A MAN OF WAR IF HE WANTS TO BE.” . EVEN THE DATES LISTED IN HIS MANIFESTO ARE ALIGNED WITH DATES IN THE HISTORY OF THE CHRISTIAN/MUSLIM CONFLICTS. FOR EXAMPLE, THE DATE HE SELECTED FOR THE FINAL PURGE OF MUSLIMS FROM NORWAY WAS IN 2083, THE 400TH ANNIVERSARY OF 1683 AT THE BATTLE OF VIENNA, WHERE THE MUSLIM OTTOMAN EMPIRE WAS DEFEATED AND STOPPED FROM INVADING THE REST OF EUROPE. JUST AS THE RADICAL MUSLIM TERRORISTS ARE MUSLIM, THIS RADICAL CHRISTIAN TERRORIST IS A CHRISTIAN. AND JUST AS MODERATE MUSLIMS MUST SPEAK OUT AGAINST THE VIOLENT ACTS OF THEIR RADICAL BRETHREN, CHRISTIANS MUST SPEAK OUT STRONGLY AGAINST THIS RADICAL TERRORIST WITHIN THEIR RANKS.

    RADICAL MUSLIM TERRORISTS DISTORT THE KORAN AND THE ISLAMIC TRADITION IN WAYS MOST MUSLIMS WOULD NEVER ACCEPT. BUT NEVERTHELESS, THEY BASE THEIR TERRORISM IN THAT TRADITION. ANDERS BREIVIK HAS DONE THE SAME. THE ISLAMOFASCISTS ATTACK AND KILL THEIR OWN PEOPLE IN ORDER TO FURTHER THEIR OWN RADICAL ENDS. THEY’VE KILLED THEIR OWN PEOPLE IN IRAQ, IN MOROCCO, IN AFGHANISTAN. WHY? MANY ISLAMIC RADICALS GREATER ANIMOSITY TOWARD DISSENTING MUSLIMS THAN TOWARD WESTERNERS. IN PAKISTAN, THE RADICAL GROUP SUNNI MUSLIM GROUP SIPAH-I-SAHABA HAS NOT ONLY KILLED MANY MEMBERS OF THE SHIA MINORITY, BUT MANY OF THEIR OWN SUNNI CLERICS AS WELL, BECAUSE THE CLERICS REJECTED THEIR EXTREMIST AGENDA. OFTEN, IMPOSING THEIR RADICAL VISION OF ISLAM IS MORE IMPORTANT TO THEM THAN HATRED OF THE WEST.

    SIMILARLY, THIS CHRISTIAN TERRORIST TARGETED HIS OWN PEOPLE. HE WANTED TO KILL MEMBERS OF THE LABOR PARTY, NATIVE BORN NORWEGIANS, BECAUSE IN HIS TWISTED MIND, ELIMINATING MEMBERS OF A LIBERAL POLITICAL PARTY IN HIS OWN COUNTRY WAS MORE IMPORTANT TO HIM THAN ELIMINATING AN OUTSIDE THREAT. I’VE SAID TIME AFTER TIME ON THIS SHOW THAT THE GREATEST VICTIMS OF RADICAL ISLAM ARE THEIR OWN CO-RELIGIONISTS. AND NOW A RADICAL CHRISTIAN FUNDAMENTALIST HAS ATTACKED HIS OWN PEOPLE IN ORDER TO FURTHER HIS EXTREMIST CAUSE.

    IT’S TRUE THAT ANDERS BREIVIK TWISTED THE CHRISTIAN TRADITION IN DIRECTIONS 99 PERCENT OF CHRISTIANS COULD NEVER ACCEPT. BUT HIS VIOLENCE WAS BASED IN CHRISTIAN THOUGHT AND HISTORY. THE ISLAMOFASCISTS KILL THEIR OWN IN PAKISTAN, IRAQ, AND AFGHANISTAN. THE RADICAL SIKH HINDUS KILLED THEIR OWN WHEN THEY BLEW UP AIR INDIA FLIGHT 182 IN 1985 AND KILLED 22 INDIANS. AND NOW A RADICAL CHRISTIAN TERRORIST IN NORWAY HAS KILLED HIS OWN AS WELL. WE FIND THAT THE GREATEST ENEMY IS THE ENEMY WITHIN. AND THOSE WHO REFUSE TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE CONNECTION WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO STOP THIS MADNESS WITHIN THEIR RANKS.

    http://www.michaelsavage.wnd.com/2011/07/the-christian-terrorist-the-greatest-enemy-is-the-enemy-within/

  7. Varagić Nikola каже:

    The US-Al Qaeda Alliance: Bosnia, Kosovo and Now Libya. Washington’s On-Going Collusion with Terrorists

    *

    Peter Dale Scott, a former Canadian diplomat and English Professor at the University of California, Berkeley, is the author of Drugs Oil and War,The Road to 9/11, and The War Conspiracy: JFK, 9/11, and the Deep Politics of War. His most recent book is American War Machine: Deep Politics, the CIA Global Drug Connection and the Road to Afghanistan.

    Prof. Peter Dale Scott
    The Asia-Pacific Journal Vol 9, Issue 31 No 1, August 1, 2011
    July 30, 2011

    Twice in the last two decades, significant cuts in U.S. and western military spending were foreseen: first after the fall of the Berlin Wall, and then in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis. But both times military spending soon increased, and among the factors contributing to the increase were America’s interventions in new areas: the Balkans in the 1990s, and Libya today.1 Hidden from public view in both cases was the extent to which al-Qaeda was a covert U.S. ally in both interventions, rather than its foe.

    U.S. interventions in the Balkans and then Libya were presented by the compliant U.S. and allied mainstream media as humanitarian. Indeed, some Washington interventionists may have sincerely believed this. But deeper motivations – from oil to geostrategic priorities – were also at work in both instances.

    In virtually all the wars since 1989, America and Islamist factions have been battling to determine who will control the heartlands of Eurasia in the post-Soviet era. In some countries – Somalia in 1993, Afghanistan in 2001 – the conflict has been straightforward, with each side using the other’s excesses as an excuse for intervention.

    But there have been other interventions in which Americans have used al-Qaeda as a resource to increase their influence, for example Azerbaijan in 1993. There a pro-Moscow president was ousted after large numbers of Arab and other foreign mujahedin veterans were secretly imported from Afghanistan, on an airline hastily organized by three former veterans of the CIA’s airline Air America. (The three, all once detailed from the Pentagon to the CIA, were Richard Secord, Harry Aderholt, and Ed Dearborn.)2 This was an ad hoc marriage of convenience: the mujahedin got to defend Muslims against Russian influence in the enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh, while the Americans got a new president who opened up the oilfields of Baku to western oil companies.

    The pattern of U.S. collaboration with Muslim fundamentalists against more secular enemies is not new. It dates back to at least 1953, when the CIA recruited right-wing mullahs to overthrow Prime Minister Mossadeq in Iran, and also began to cooperate with the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood.3 But in Libya in 2011 we see a more complex marriage of convenience between US and al-Qaeda elements: one which repeats a pattern seen in Bosnia in 1992-95, and Kosovo in 1997-98. In those countries America responded to a local conflict in the name of a humanitarian intervention to restrain the side committing atrocities. But in all three cases both sides committed atrocities, and American intervention in fact favored the side allied with al-Qaeda.

    The cause of intervention was fostered in all three cases by blatant manipulation and falsification of the facts. What a historian has noted of the Bosnian conflict was true also of Kosovo and is being echoed today in Libya: though attacks were “perpetrated by Serbs and Muslims alike,” the pattern in western media was “that killings of Muslims were newsworthy, while the deaths of non-Muslims were not.”4 Reports of mass rapes in the thousands proved to be wildly exaggerated: a French journalist “uncovered only four women willing to back up the story.”5 Meanwhile in 1994 the French intellectual Bernard-Henri Lévy (BHL) traveled to Bosnia and fervently endorsed the case for intervention in Bosnia; in 2011 February BHL traveled to Benghazi and reprised his interventionist role for Libya.6

    In all of the countries mentioned above, furthermore, there are signs that some American and/or western intelligence groups were collaborating with al-Qaeda elements from the outset of conflict, before the atrocities cited as a reason for intervention.. This suggests that there were deeper reasons for America’s interventions including the desire of western oil companies to exploit the petroleum reserves of Libya (as in Iraq) without having to deal with a troublesome and powerful strong man, or their desire to create a strategic oil pipeline across the Balkans (in Kosovo).7

    That the U.S. would support al-Qaeda in terrorist atrocities runs wholly counter to impressions created by the U.S. media. Yet this on-going unholy alliance resurrects and builds on the alliance underlying Zbigniew Brzezinski’s 1978-79 strategy of provocation in Afghanistan, at a time when he was President Carter’s National Security Adviser.

    In those years Brzezinski did not hesitate to play the terrorist card against the Soviet Union: he reinforced the efforts of the SAVAK (the Shah of Iran’s intelligence service) to work with the Islamist antecedents of al-Qaeda to destabilize Afghanistan, in a way which soon led to a Soviet invasion of that country.8 At the time, as he later boasted, Brzezinski told Carter, “We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam War.”9

    CIA Director William Casey continued this strategy of using terrorists against the USSR in Afghanistan. At first the CIA channeled aid through the Pakistani ISI (Interservices Intelligence Service) to their client Afghan extremists like Gulbeddin Hekmatyar (today one of America’s enemies in Afghanistan). But in 1986, “Casey committed CIA support to a long-standing ISI initiative to recruit radical Muslims from around the world to come to Pakistan and fight with the Afghan Mujaheddin.”10 CIA aid now reached their support Office of Services in Peshawar, headed by a Palestinian, Abdullah Azzam, and by Osama bin Laden. The al-Kifah Center, a U.S. recruitment office for their so-called Arab-Afghan foreign legion (the future al Qaeda), was set up in the al-Farook mosque in Brooklyn.11

    It is important to recall Brzezinski’s and Casey’s use of terrorists today. For in Libya, as earlier in Kosovo and Bosnia, there are alarming signs that America has continued to underwrite Islamist terrorism as a means to dismantle socialist or quasi-socialist nations not previously in its orbit: first the USSR, then Yugoslavia, today Libya. As I have written elsewhere, Gaddafi was using the wealth of Libya, the only Mediterranean nation still armed by Russia and independent of the NATO orbit, to impose more and more difficult terms for western oil companies, and to make the whole of Africa more independent of Europe and America.12

    Support for the mujahedin included collusion in law-breaking, at a heavy cost. In the second part of this essay, I will show how government protection of key figures in the Brooklyn al-Kifah Center left some of them free, even after they were known to have committed crimes, to engage in further terrorist acts in the United States — such as the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993.

    *

    The U.S.-al-Qaeda Alliance in Libya

    The NATO intervention in Libya has been presented as a humanitarian campaign. But it is not: both factions have been committing atrocities. Thanks in part to the efforts of the well-connected p.r. firm the Harbour Group, working on behalf of the Benghazi opposition’s National Transitional Council [NTC], Americans have heard many more press accounts of atrocities by pro-Gaddafi forces in Libya than by the Benghazi opposition.13 But in fact, as the London Daily Telegraph reported,

    Under rebel control, Benghazi residents are terrorized, many “too frightened to drive through the dark streets at night, fearing a shakedown or worse at the proliferating checkpoints.”

    Moreover, about 1.5 million black African migrant workers feel trapped under suspicion of supporting the wrong side. Numbers of them have been attacked, some hunted down, dragged from apartments, beaten and killed. So-called “revolutionaries” and “freedom fighters” are, in fact, rampaging gunmen committing atrocities airbrushed from mainstream reports, unwilling to reveal the new Libya if Gaddafi is deposed.14

    Thomas Mountain concurs that “Since the rebellion in Benghazi broke out several hundred Sudanese, Somali, Ethiopian and Eritrean guest workers have been robbed and murdered by racist rebel militias, a fact well hidden by the international media.”15 Such reports have continued. Recently, Human Rights Watch accused the rebels of killing Gaddafi supporters who were just civilians and looting, burning and ransacking pro-Gaddafi supporters’ houses and areas.16

    Americans and Europeans are still less likely to learn from their media that among the groups in the Benghazi transitional coalition, certainly the most battle-seasoned, are veterans of the Al-Jama’a al-Islamiyyah al-Muqatilah bi-Libya (Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, or LIFG). The importance of the LIFG contingent in the TNC has been downplayed in a recent issue of the International Business Times:

    The LIFG is a radical Islamic group which has been fighting small scale guerrilla warfare against Gaddafi for almost a decade. Much of the LIFG leadership came from soldiers who fought against the Soviet forces in Afghanistan, as part of the Mujahedeen. Since the beginning of the uprising reports said that some of the LIFG has joined the TNC rebel movement on the ground, and many accused the fighters of having links to Al-Qaeda, which the LIFG has since denied.

    Previously however, the LIFG had stated that its ultimate goal is to install an Islamic state inside Libya, which given the fact that many of its fighters are now on the side of the TNC is quite worrying. However as the LIFG is reported to have a fighting force of no more than a few thousand men, it is believed it will not be able to cause much trouble within the opposition.17

    It remains to be seen whether a victorious TNC would be able to contain the Islamist aspirations of the ruthless jihadist veterans in their ranks.

    There are those who fear that, from their years of combat in Afghanistan and Iraq, the battle-hardened LIFG, although probably not dominant in the Benghazi coalition today, will come to enjoy more influence if Benghazi ever gets to distribute the spoils of victory. In February 2004, then-Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee that “one of the most immediate threats [to U.S. security in Iraq] is from smaller international Sunni extremist groups that have benefited from al-Qaida links. They include … the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group.”18 In 2007 a West Point study reported on “the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group’s (LIFG) increasingly cooperative relationship with al-Qaeda, which culminated in the LIFG officially joining al-Qaeda on November 3, 2007.”19

    Although Britain and the US were well aware of the West Point assessment of the hard-core LIFG in the Benghazi TNC coalition, their special forces nevertheless secretly backed the Benghazi TNC, even before the launch of NATO air support:

    The bombing of the country came as it was revealed that hundreds of British special forces troops have been deployed deep inside Libya targeting Colonel Gaddafi’s forces – and more are on standby….

    In total it is understood that just under 250 UK special forces soldiers and their support have been in Libya since before the launch of air strikes to enforce the no-fly zone against Gaddafi’s forces.20

    There are also reports that U.S. Special Forces were also sent into Libya on February 23 and 24, 2011, almost a month before the commencement of NATO bombing.21

    UK support for the fundamentalist LIFG was in fact at least a decade old:

    Fierce clashes between [Qadhafi’s] security forces and Islamist guerrillas erupted in Benghazi in September 1995, leaving dozens killed on both sides. After weeks of intense fighting, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) formally declared its existence in a communiqué calling Qadhafi’s government “an apostate regime that has blasphemed against the faith of God Almighty” and declaring its overthrow to be “the foremost duty after faith in God.” This and future LIFG communiqués were issued by Libyan Afghans who had been granted political asylum in Britain…. The involvement of the British government in the LIFG campaign against Qadhafi remains the subject of immense controversy. LIFG’s next big operation, a failed attempt to assassinate Qadhafi in February 1996 that killed several of his bodyguards, was later said to have been financed by British intelligence to the tune of $160,000, according to ex-MI5 officer David Shayler.22

    David Shayler’s detailed account has been challenged, but many other sources reveal that UK support for Libyan jihadists long antedates the present conflict.23

    Even more ominous for the future than the nationalistic LIFG may be the fighters from the more internationalist Al Qaeda in the Maghreb (AQIM) who have seized the opportunity presented by the war to enter the conflict, and equip themselves from Gaddafi’s looted armories.24 AQIM presents a special concern because of recent reports that, like other al Qaeda associates from Afghanistan to Kosovo, it is increasingly financed by payoffs from regional drug traffickers.25

    In short, the NATO campaign in Libya is in support of a coalition in which the future status of present and former al-Qaeda allies is likely to be strengthened.26 And western forces have been secretly supporting them from the outset.

    The U.S.-al-Qaeda Alliance in Bosnia

    Similarly, Clinton’s interventions in Bosnia and Kosovo were presented as humanitarian. But both sides had committed atrocities in those conflicts; Like the western media, Washington downplayed the Muslim atrocities because of its other interests.

    Most Americans are aware that Clinton dispatched U.S. forces to Bosnia to enforce the Dayton peace accords after a well-publicized Serbian atrocity: the massacre of thousands of Muslims at Srebrenica. Thanks to a vigorous campaign by the p.r. firm Ruder Finn, Americans heard a great deal about the Srebrenica massacre, but far less about the beheadings and other atrocities by Muslims that preceded and helped account for it.

    A major reason for the Serb attack on Srebrenica was to deal with the armed attacks mounted from that base on nearby villages: “intelligence sources said it was that harassment which precipitated the Serb attack on the 1,500 Muslim defenders inside the enclave.”27 General Philippe Morillon, commander of the UN troops in Bosnia from 1992 to 1993, testified to the ICTY (International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia) that Muslim forces based in Srebrenica had “engaged in attacks during Orthodox holidays and destroyed villages, massacring all the inhabitants. This created a degree of hatred that was quite extraordinary in the region”28 According to Prof. John Schindler,

    Between May and December 1992, Muslim forces repeatedly attacked Serb villages around Srebrenica, killing and torturing civilians; some were mutilated and burned alive. Even pro-Sarajevo accounts concede that Muslim forces in Srebrenica…murdered over 1,300 Serbs…and had “ethnically cleansed a vast area.29

    Former U.S. ambassador to Croatia Peter Galbraith later admitted in an interview that the U.S. administration was aware of “small numbers of atrocities” being committed by the foreign mujahedin in Bosnia, but dismissed the atrocities as “in the scheme of things not a big issue.”30

    Other sources reveal that Washington gave a tacit green light to Croatia’s arming and augmentation of the Muslim presence in Srebrenica.31 Soon C-130 Hercules planes. some but not all of them Iranian, were dropping arms to the Muslims, in violation of the international arms embargo which the U.S. officially respected. More Arab-Afghan mujahedin arrived as well. Many of the airdrops and some of the mujahedin were at Tuzla, 70 kilometers from Srebrenica.32

    According to The Spectator (London), the Pentagon was using other countries such as Turkey and Iran in this flow of arms and warriors:

    From 1992 to 1995, the Pentagon assisted with the movement of thousands of Mujahideen and other Islamic elements from Central Asia into Europe, to fight alongside Bosnian Muslims against the Serbs. …. As part of the Dutch government’s inquiry into the Srebrenica massacre of July 1995, Professor Cees Wiebes of Amsterdam University compiled a report entitled ‘Intelligence and the War in Bosnia’, published in April 2002. In it he details the secret alliance between the Pentagon and radical Islamic groups from the Middle East, and their efforts to assist Bosnia’s Muslims. By 1993, there was a vast amount of weapons-smuggling through Croatia to the Muslims, organised by ‘clandestine agencies’ of the USA, Turkey and Iran, in association with a range of Islamic groups that included Afghan Mujahideen and the pro-Iranian Hezbollah. Arms bought by Iran and Turkey with the financial backing of Saudi Arabia were airlifted from the Middle East to Bosnia — airlifts with which, Wiebes points out, the USA was ‘very closely involved’.33

    Cees Wiebes’ detailed account, based on years of research, documents both the case for American responsibility and the vigorous American denials of it:

    At 17.45 on 10 February 1995, the Norwegian Captain Ivan Moldestad, a Norwegian helicopter detachment (NorAir) pilot, stood in the doorway of his temporary accommodation just outside Tuzla. It was dark, and suddenly he heard the sound of the propellers of an approaching transport aircraft; it was unmistakably a four engine Hercules C-130. Moldestad noticed that the Hercules was being escorted by two jet fighters, but could not tell their precise type in the darkness. There were other sightings of this secretive night-time flight to Tuzla Air Base (TAB). A sentry who was on guard duty outside the Norwegian medical UN unit in Tuzla also heard and saw the lights of the Hercules and the accompanying jet fighters. Other UN observers, making use of night vision equipment, also saw the cargo aircraft and the fighter planes concerned. The reports were immediately forwarded to the NATO Combined Air Operations Center (CAOC) in Vicenza and the UNPF Deny Flight Cell in Naples. When Moldestad phoned Vicenza, he was told that there was nothing in the air that night, and that he must be mistaken. When Moldestad persisted, the connection was broken.

    The secretive C-130 cargo aircraft flights and night-time arms drops on Tuzla caused great agitation within UNPROFOR and the international community in February and March 1995. When asked, a British general responded with great certainty to the question of the origin of the secret supplies via TAB: ‘They were American arms deliveries. No doubt about that. And American private companies were involved in these deliveries.’ This was no surprising answer, because this general had access to intelligence gathered by a unit of the British Special Air Services (SAS) in Tuzla. The aircraft had come within range of this unit’s special night vision equipment, and the British saw them land. It was a confirmation that a clandestine American operation had taken place in which arms, ammunition and military communication equipment were supplied to the ABiH. These night-time operations led to much consternation within the UN and NATO, and were the subject of countless speculations.34

    Wiebes reports the possibility that the C-130s, some of which were said to have taken off from a US Air Force base in Germany, were actually controlled by Turkish authorities.35 But U.S. involvement was detected in the elaborate cover-up, from the fact that US AWACS aircraft, which should have provided a record of the secret flights, were either withdrawn from duty at the relevant times, or manned with US crews.36

    A summary of Wiebes’ exhaustive report was published in the Guardian:

    The Dutch report reveals how the Pentagon formed a secret alliance with Islamist groups in an Iran-Contra-style operation.

    US, Turkish and Iranian intelligence groups worked with the Islamists in what the Dutch report calls the “Croatian pipeline”. Arms bought by Iran and Turkey and financed by Saudi Arabia were flown into Croatia initially by the official Iranian airline, Iran Air, and later in a fleet of black C-130 Hercules aircraft.

    The report says that mojahedin fighters were also flown in, and that the US was “very closely involved” in the operation which was in flagrant breach of the embargo. British secret services obtained documents proving that Iran also arranged deliveries of arms directly to Bosnia, it says.

    The operation was promoted by the Pentagon, rather than the CIA, which was cautious about using Islamist groups as a conduit for arms, and about breaching the embargo. When the CIA tried to place its own people on the ground in Bosnia, the agents were threatened by the mojahedin fighters and the Iranians who were training them.

    The UN relied on American intelligence to monitor the embargo, a dependency which allowed Washington to manipulate it at will.37

    Meanwhile the Al-Kifah Center in Brooklyn, which in the 1980s had supported the “Arab-Afghans” fighting in Afghanistan, turned its attentions to Bosnia.

    Al-Kifah’s English-language newsletter Al-Hussam (The Sword) also began publishing regular updates on jihad action in Bosnia….Under the control of the minions of Shaykh Omar Abdel Rahman, the newsletter aggressively incited sympathetic Muslims to join the jihad in Bosnia and Afghanistan themselves….The Al-Kifah Bosnian branch office in Zagreb, Croatia, housed in a modern, two-story building, was evidently in close communication with the organizational headquarters in New York. The deputy director of the Zagreb office, Hassan Hakim, admitted to receiving all orders and funding directly from the main United States office of Al-Kifah on Atlantic Avenue controlled by Shaykh Omar Abdel Rahman.38

    One of the trainers at al-Kifah, Rodney Hampton-El, assisted in this support program, recruiting warriors from U.S. Army bases like Fort Belvoir, and also training them to be fighters in New Jersey.39 In 1995 Hampton-El was tried and convicted for his role (along with al-Kifah leader Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman) in the plot to blow up New York landmarks. At the trial Hampton-El testified how he was personally given thousands of dollars for this project by Saudi Crown Prince Faisal in the Washington Saudi Embassy.40

    About this time, Ayman al-Zawahiri, today the leader of al Qaeda, came to America to raise funds in Silicon Valley, where he was hosted by Ali Mohamed, a U.S. double agent and veteran of U.S. Army Special Forces who had been the top trainer at the Al-Kifah mosque.41 Almost certainly al-Zawahiri’s fund-raising was in support of the mujahedin in Bosnia, reportedly his chief concern at the time. (“The Asian edition of the Wall Street Journal reported that, in 1993, Mr. bin Laden had appointed Sheik Ayman Al-Zawahiri, the al-Qaeda’s second-in-command, to direct his operations in the Balkans.”)42

    Wiebes’ detailed report and the news stories based on it corroborated earlier charges made in 1997 by Sir Alfred Sherman, top adviser to Margaret Thatcher and co-founder of the influential rightwing nationalist Centre for Policy Studies, that “The U.S. encouraged and facilitated the dispatch of arms to the Moslems via Iran and Eastern Europe — a fact which was denied in Washington at the time in face of overwhelming evidence.”43 This was part of his case that

    The war in Bosnia was America’s war in every sense of the word. The US administration helped start it, kept it going, and prevented its early end. Indeed all the indications are that it intends to continue the war in the near future, as soon as its Moslem proteges are fully armed and trained.

    Specifically, Sherman charged that in 1992 Acting Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger had instructed Warren Zimmerman, U.S. Ambassador in Belgrade, to persuade Bosnian President Izetbegovic to renege on his agreement to preserve Bosnian-Croatian-Serbian unity, and instead accept American aid for an independent Bosnian state.44

    The U.S.-al-Qaeda Alliance in Kosovo

    This raises the disturbing question: were some Americans willing to ignore the atrocities of the al-Kifah mujahideen in Bosnia in exchange for mujahideen assistance in NATO’s successive wars dismantling Yugoslavia, the last surviving socialist republic in Europe? One thing is clear: Sir Alfred Sherman’s prediction in 1997 that America “intends to continue the war in the near future” soon proved accurate, when in 1999 American support for al-Qaeda’s allies in Kosovo, the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), led to a controversial NATO bombing campaign.

    As was widely reported at the time, the KLA was supported both by the networks of bin Laden and al-Zawahiri, and also by the traffic in Afghan heroin:

    Some members of the Kosovo Liberation Army, which has financed its war effort through the sale of heroin, were trained in terrorist camps run by international fugitive Osama bin Laden — who is wanted in the 1998 bombing of two U.S. embassies in Africa that killed 224 persons, including 12 Americans.45

    According to former DEA agent Michael Levine, the decision of Clinton to back the KLA dismayed his DEA contacts who knew it to be a major drug-trafficking organization.46 As Ralf Mutschke of Interpol testified to Congress,

    In 1998, the U.S. State Department listed the KLA as a terrorist organization, indicating that it was financing its operations with money from the international heroin trade and loans from Islamic countries and individuals, among them allegedly Usama bin Laden. Another link to bin Laden is the fact that the brother of a leader in an Egyptian Djihad organization and also a military commander of Usama bin Laden, was leading an elite KLA unit during the Kosovo conflict. [This is almost certainly Zaiman or Mohammed al-Zawahiri, one of the brothers of Ayman al-Zawahiri.] In 1998, the KLA was described as a key player in the drugs for arms business in 1998, “helping to transport 2 billion USD worth of drugs annually into Western Europe”. The KLA and other Albanian groups seem to utilize a sophisticated network of accounts and companies to process funds. In 1998, Germany froze two bank accounts belonging to the “United Kosova” organization after it had been discovered that several hundred thousand dollars had been deposited into those accounts by a convicted Kosovar Albanian drug trafficker.47

    According to the London Sunday Times, the KLA’s background did not deter the US from training and strengthening it:

    American intelligence agents have admitted they helped to train the Kosovo Liberation Army before Nato’s bombing of Yugoslavia. The disclosure angered some European diplomats, who said this had undermined moves for a political solution to the conflict between Serbs and Albanians. Central Intelligence Agency officers were ceasefire monitors in Kosovo in 1998 and 1999, developing ties with the KLA and giving American military training manuals and field advice on fighting the Yugoslav army and Serbian police.

    When the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), which co-ordinated the monitoring, left Kosovo a week before airstrikes began a year ago, many of its satellite telephones and global positioning systems were secretly handed to the KLA, ensuring that guerrilla commanders could stay in touch with Nato and Washington. Several KLA leaders had the mobile phone number of General Wesley Clark, the Nato commander.48

    According to former U.S. Army Captain David Hackworth, later Newsweek’s contributing editor for defense, former US military officers in the private U.S. military contractor MPRI (Military Professional Resources Incorporated) not only trained KLA personnel, but even fought alongside them.49 This reinforced earlier reports that MPRI personnel had also been involved in training Croatians at the time of the illicit Croatian arms pipeline to Bosnia.50

    After Kosovo, Sherman repeated his warnings against “expanding American hegemony”, exercised through NATO with varying degrees of partnership and subordination of other players. …. The process commenced with the deliberate break-up of Yugoslavia, led by Germany and acquiesced in by the other European Union members and the United States (1991). It progressed with sanctions against Serbia for attempting to help the western Serbs (1992). In Bosnia America’s early involvement sparked off civil war (the Zimmerman Visit to Izetbegovic, in the aftermath of the Lisbon Agreement), and it eventually matured into the bombing campaign of 1999 and the occupation of Kosovo.51

    Others suspected that America’s involvement was motivated by its desire to see a new Trans-Balkan pipeline and a new U.S. military base in the Balkans to defend it. Although such critics were initially ridiculed, both predictions soon proved true. The U.S.-registered AMBO corporation, headed by former BP executive Ted Ferguson, began construction of a pipeline from Albania to Macedonia in 2007.52 And nearby is a semi-permanent U.S. Army base, Camp Bondsteel, that can hold up to 7000 soldiers.

    In 2007, President George W. Bush created a new United States Africa Command, U.S. AFRICOM. But its HQ at present is in Stuttgart, Germany. This has led to speculation on the Internet that America has its eyes on Libya’s international airport, which the U.S. Air Force had operated as Wheelus Air Force Base until its ouster in 1970.

    II. From the First WTC Bombing to 9/11: The Domestic U.S. Fallout from Collusion with Terrorists

    The fact that Americans have had repeated recourse to al-Qaeda Islamists as assets in their expansive projects does not constitute proof that there is any long-term systematic strategy to do so, still less that there is a secret alliance.

    I believe rather that America is suffering from a malignant condition of military power run amok – power which, like a malignant cancer, tends to reproduce itself at times in ways counterproductive to larger goals. Those who are appointed to manage this vast power become inured to using any available assets, in order to sustain a sociodynamic of global intervention that they are, ironically, powerless to challenge or turn around. The few dissenters who try to do so are predictably sidelined or even ejected from the heights of power, as not being “on the team.”

    Those in Washington who decided to assist terrorists and drug traffickers seem not to have considered such “externalities” as the domestic consequences from official dealings with criminal terrorist networks that are global in scope. Yet the consequences were and are real, for the Islamist terrorists that were protected by the US in their subversion of order in Kosovo and other countries were soon being protected inside the US as well. As former DEA agent Michael Levine reported of the KLA-linked drug networks, “These guys have a network that’s active on the streets of this country…. They’re the worst elements of society that you can imagine, and now, according to my sources in drug enforcement, they’re politically protected.”53

    In other words, Kosovars were now enjoying the de facto protection in their U.S. drug trafficking that had earlier been enjoyed by the CIA’s Chinese, Cuban, Italian, Thai, and other ethnic assets dating from the 1940s.54

    Mother Jones reported in 2000, after the NATO bombing in support of the KLA that Afghan heroin, much of it distributed by Kosovar Albanians, now accounted for almost 20 percent of the heroin seized in America — nearly double the percentage taken four years earlier.55 Meanwhile in Europe, it was estimated that “Kosovo Albanians control 40% of Europe’s heroin.”56 In addition there is a near universal consensus that the outcome of the war in Bosnia left al-Qaeda’s jihadists much more strongly entrenched in the Balkans than they had been earlier. In the words of Professor John Schindler, Bosnia, “the most pro-Western society in the umma [Muslim world],” was “converted into a Jihadistan through domestic deceit, violent conflict, and misguided international intervention.”57

    It is too soon to predict with confidence what will be the domestic fallout or “blowback” from NATO’s empowerment of Islamists by creating chaos in Libya. But the domestic consequences of similar U.S. interventions in the past are indisputable, and have contributed to major acts of terrorism in this country.

    American protection for the Al-Kifah mujahedin support base in Brooklyn led to interference in domestic U.S. law enforcement. This enabled mujahedin recruits at al-Kifah to plot and/or engage in a number of domestic and foreign terrorist attacks on America. These attacks include the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993, the so-called “New York landmarks plot” of 1995, and the Embassy attacks of 1998 in Kenya and Tanzania. Involved in all of these events were terrorists who should have been rounded up earlier because of crimes already committed, but were allowed to stay free.

    Central to all of these attacks was the role of Ali Mohamed, the former U.S. Special Forces double agent at al-Kifah, and his trainees. Ali Mohamed, despite being on a State Department Watch List, had come to America around 1984, on what an FBI consultant has called “a visa program controlled by the CIA.”58 So did the “blind Sheik” Omar Abdel Rahman, the leader of al-Kifah; Rahman was issued two visas, one of them “by a CIA officer working undercover in the consular section of the American embassy in Sudan.”59

    Ali Mohamed trained al-Kifah recruits in guerrilla tactics near Brooklyn. This operation was considered so sensitive that the New York police and the FBI later protected two of the recruits from arrest, when they murdered the Jewish extremist Meir Kahane. Instead, the New York Police called the third assassin (El Sayyid Nosair) a “lone deranged gunman,” and released the other two (Mahmoud Abouhalima and Mohammed Salameh) from detention. This enabled Abouhalima and Salameh, along with another Ali Mohamed trainee (Nidal Ayyad) to take part three years later in the first (1993) bombing of the World Trade Center.60

    Prosecutors protected Ali Mohamed again in the 1994-95 “Landmarks” trial, when Omar Abdul Rahman and some of Mohamed’s trainees were convicted of conspiring to blow up New York buildings. In that case the prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald, named Ali Mohamed as an unindicted co-conspirator, yet allowed him to remain free. When the defense issued a subpoena for Mohamed to appear in court, the prosecutor intervened to avoid Mohamed’s having to testify.61

    Ali Mohamed was well aware of his protected status, and used it in early 1993 to obtain his release when detained by the RCMP at Vancouver Airport. As this episode has so ignored in the US press, I will quote the account of it in Canada’s premier newspaper, the Toronto Globe and Mail:

    The RCMP had their hands on one of the key insiders of Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda terrorist network, but he was released after he had Mounties call his handler at the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation.

    Ali Mohamed, a Californian of Egyptian origin who is believed to be the highest ranking al-Qaeda member to have landed in Canada, was working with U.S. counterterrorist agents, playing a double or triple game, when he was questioned in 1993. Mr. Mohamed now is in a U.S. prison.

    “The people of the RCMP told me by midnight that I can go now,” Mr. Mohamed — who confessed in the United States to being a close bin Laden associate — wrote at the time in an affidavit shown Wednesday to The Globe and Mail.

    The incident happened after customs agents at Vancouver International Airport detained Essam Marzouk, an Egyptian who had arrived from Damascus via Frankfurt, after they found him carrying two forged Saudi passports.

    Mr. Mohamed, who was waiting to pick him up at the airport, inquired of the police about his friend’s detention. That made the RCMP curious about Mr. Mohamed, but he dispelled their suspicions by telling them he was a collaborator with the FBI.62

    The Globe and Mail story makes it clear that in 1993 Mohamed already had a handler at the FBI, to whom the RCMP deferred. Patrick Fitzgerald, in his statement to the 9/11 Commission, gave a quite different story: that Mohamed, after returning from Nairobi in 1994, applied for a job “as an FBI translator.”63 The difference is vital: because the FBI told the RCMP to release Mohamed, he was then able to travel to Nairobi and plan for bombing the U.S. Embassy there.

    According to author Peter Lance, by 2007 Fitzgerald had enough evidence to arrest and indict Mohamed, but did not. Instead he interviewed Mohamed in California, along with an FBI agent, Jack Cloonan. After the interview Fitzgerald chose not to arrest Mohamed, but instead to tap his phone and bug his computer. Lance asks a very relevant question: did Fitzgerald fear that ”any indictment of al Qaeda’s chief spy would rip the lid off years of gross negligence by three of America’s top intelligence agencies”?64

    One month after the Embassy bombings, Ali Mohamed was finally arrested, on September 10, 1998. Yet when Fitzgerald handed down thirteen indictments two months later, Mohamed’s name was not among them. Instead Fitzgerald again allowed him to avoid cross-examination in court by accepting a plea bargain, the terms of which are still partly unknown. Specifically we do not know the term of Mohamed’s sentence: that page of his court appearance transcript (p. 17) is filed under seal.65

    As part of the plea bargain, Mohamed told the court that at the personal request of bin Laden, he did surveillance on the U.S. Embassy in Kenya, “took pictures, drew diagrams, and wrote a report” which he personally delivered to bin Laden in the Sudan.66 Patrick Fitzgerald, the prosecutor who negotiated the plea bargain, testified at length about Mohamed to the 9/11 Commission, who concluded in their Report (p. 68) that Mohamed “led” the embassy bombing operation. Ironically, the Embassy bombing is the official reason today why Zawahiri (like bin Laden before him) is wanted by the FBI, with a $25 million bounty on his head.

    But the American public has been denied the right to learn about Ali Mohamed’s involvement in other terrorist events. Particularly relevant would be his involvement in 9/11. As his FBI handler Cloonan later reported, Mohamed explained to him that he personally trained the accused hijackers in how to seize planes:

    He [had] conducted training for al Qaeda on how to hijack a plane. He ran practical exercises in Pakistan and he said, “This is how you get a box cutter on board. You take the knife, you remove the blade and you wrap it in [word blacked out] and put it in your carry-on luggage.” They’d read the FAA regulations. They knew four inches wouldn’t go through. “This is how you position yourself,” he said. “I taught people how to sit in first class. You sit here and some sit here.” He wrote the whole thing out.67

    Conclusion

    At present America is in the midst of an unprecedented budget crisis, brought on in large part by its multiple wars. Nevertheless it is also on the point of several further interventions: in Yemen, Somalia, possibly Syria or Iran (where the CIA is said to be in contact with the drug-trafficking al-Qaeda offshoot Jundallah),68 and most assuredly in Libya.

    Only the American public can stop them. But in order for the people to rise up and cry Stop! there must first be a better understanding of the dark alliances underlying America’s alleged humanitarian interventions.

    This awareness may increase when Americans finally realize that there is domestic blowback from assisting terrorists as well. The long elaborate dance between Mohamed and his Justice Department overseers makes it clear that the handling of terrorists for corrupt purposes corrupts the handlers as well as the terrorists. Eventually both the handlers and the handled become in effect co-conspirators, with secrets about their collusion both parties need to conceal.

    Until the public takes notice, that concealment of collusion will continue. And as long as it continues, we will continue to be denied the truth about what collusions underlay 9/11.

    Worse, we are likely to see more terrorist attacks, at home as well as abroad, along with more illegal, costly, and unnecessary wars.

    Peter Dale Scott, a former Canadian diplomat and English Professor at the University of California, Berkeley, is the author of Drugs Oil and War,The Road to 9/11, and The War Conspiracy: JFK, 9/11, and the Deep Politics of War. His most recent book is American War Machine: Deep Politics, the CIA Global Drug Connection and the Road to Afghanistan.

    http://japanfocus.org/-Peter_Dale-Scott/3578

  8. Varagić Nikola каже:

    Report links European extremists with Israeli politicians

    [01.08.2011, 10:20pm, Mon. GMT]

    Der Spiegel has published an article probing the connection between Norway’s ruthless murderer, Anders Breivik, and Israel. The German magazine says the killer’s 1,500 page manifesto describes a link between right-wing extremists and members of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition. The manifesto details at length Breivik’s support for a battle against Islam in Europe.
    The Der Spiegel article focuses on the connection “Islamophobic parties” in the continent may have with Israel, especially due to legislator Ayoob Kara’s recent meetings with extreme rightists in Europe, which attracted criticism in Israel.

    The leader of the Freedom Party of Austria, Heinz-Christian Strache, said in an interview that “one can’t be totally sure that… in the end, we might see Islamist theocracies surrounding Israel and in Europe’s backyard”.

    “In other words, in the battle against what right-wing populists see as the creeping Islamisation of Europe, Israel is on the front line,” the writer interprets.

    The article also references a speech by the former Yisrael Beiteinu’s Eliezer “Cheetah” Cohen, together with the well-known Dutch parliamentarian Geert Wilders, whose anti-Islam rhetoric has attracted huge numbers of both supporters and detractors.

    “Right-wing politicians in Europe are more sensitive to the dangers facing Israel,” Cohen told the paper. “They are talking the exact same language as Likud and others on the Israeli right…. We hope the right wing wins out in Europe.”

    Wilders has visited Israel several times, consecrating relations between Israeli and European right-wing politicians. The paper mentions settler leader Gershon Mesika, the head of the Samaria Regional Council, as one of the people who attended these meetings.

    But many in Israel see European rightists as just a step away from being neo-Nazis. At the time of his meeting with Patrick Brinkmann, whom Der Spiegel calls “a German right-wing populist,” many in Israel cried out against Kara’s co-operation with “a neo-Nazi millionaire.”

    David Lasar, a member of the Freedom Party, told the paper that despite this, “Israel today has more trust in the right-wing parties in Europe than in the left-wing parties.”

    http://www.norwaynews.com/en/~view.php?72CCiH58cKlk4672Sb9053jv9484dOT73544I64e841SJ288bsQ538

  9. Varagić Nikola каже:

    Al Gore: U.S. needs an ‘American spring’

    *

    Eric W. Dolan
    Raw Story
    Aug 3, 2011

    In an interview with Countdown host Keith Olbermann on Tuesday, former vice president and Current TV founder Al Gore said the United States needed an “American spring” like the Arab spring in the Middle East and Northern Africa.

    “We need to have an American spring,” he said. “Non-violent change, where people from the grassroots get involved again. Not in the tea party style. There are people who are genuinely upset in the tea party, I understand that, but that movement was funded with seed money from right-win billionaires, the Koch brothers, and promoted on Fox News and turned into a stalking horse for this right-wing agenda that a lot of people have been trying to push on this country for a long time.”

    “This country is in trouble,” Gore added. “Our democracy has been withering on the vine. This has been going on for some time.”

    Monday on Countdown, Gore called the U.S. system of government “broken” and “in real trouble.”

    Watch video, courtesy of Current TV, below:
    http://www.prisonplanet.com/al-gore-u-s-needs-an-%E2%80%98american-spring%E2%80%99.html

    —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–

    President Barack Obama is in Chicago Wednesday for a 50th birthday celebration.

    The event, at Uptown’s Aragon Ballroom, will include performances by Chicago’s own Jennifer Hudson, Herbie Hancock and OK Go. About 1,000 tickets were made available to the general public.

    But the event is also a campaign fundraiser. A private dinner with the president will require deep pockets: those plates go for nearly $36,000.

    Source: http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/politics/obama-birthday-chicago-126648603.html#ixzz1U1EmHE6H

    ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

    Despite the recent public lashing President Obama gave millionaires and billionaires, in private, Team Obama is once again diving into the pockets of the super rich to fund its campaign.

    With the 2012 campaign barely under way, Obama has already raised some $35 million from the biggest donors — so-called ‘bundlers’ who collect money by the truckload from the wealthy elite.

    „A bundler is someone who collects checks from other people,“ said Susan Estrich, a former Democratic campaign manager. „They may be people who work for him, who hired him as a consultant or in many cases, want to do business with them.“

    Some of the high-profile bundlers Obama signed up this year include former New Jersey Governor and Goldman Sachs CEO Jon Corzine, Vogue editor Anna Wintour, Dreamworks’ studio head Jeffery Katzenberg, and David Cohen of Comcast, the new owner of NBC-Universal.

    Wall Street, including the hedge fund managers blasted by Obama, gave the president’s 2012 campaign $7 million, followed by lawyers at $6 million and businesses at $4 million.

    Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/08/03/president-obama-looks-to-bundlers-for-2012-re-election-campaign/#ixzz1U1FHLHBk

    ———————————————————————————————————————————————————

    Billionare and progressive activist George Soros has now moved from simply the ownership of privately owned alternative media, into the realm of control and influence of the mainstream media through his massive empire and wealth.

    Recently, Soros made a large contribution to National Public Radio, which is a government controlled enterprise, and funded in part with taxpayer money. However, his $1.8 Million dollar donation to NPR is just a small portion of the total amount of money he has injected towards the influence over at least 30 recognized news sources.

    On May 11th, Fox News reported on the numerous conflicts of interest that reporters and mainstream media organizations have entered into by taking funds from Soros entities, and by sitting on corporate boards in his empire.

    Soros, who spent $27 million trying to defeat President Bush in 2004, has ties to more than 30 mainstream news outlets – including The New York Times, Washington Post, the Associated Press, NBC and ABC.

    Prominent journalists like ABC’s Christiane Amanpour and former Washington Post editor and now Vice President Len Downie serve on boards of operations that take Soros cash. This despite the Society of Professional Journalists’ ethical code stating: “avoid all conflicts real or perceived.”

    This information is part of an upcoming report by the Media Research Centers Business & Media Institute which has been looking into George Soros and his influence on the media. – Fox News

    Besides the influence that George Soros has over the media, many corporate heads of news organizations are intricately tied to the federal government they are supposed to be reporting on. GE CEO Jeffrey Immelt, who controls NBC, CNBC, and many other news stations, was an economic advisor on President Obama’s council.

    Soros has also been very influential in both the election and direction of the Obama administration. Besides the obvious conflict of interest this entails by controlling mainstream media interests, the potential for news to be jaded more towards propoganda rather than truth is a very viable observation.

    The media is changing, and Americans are slowly waking up to the fact that the old standard of journalism is no longer the respected 4th estate it once was. A gallup poll in 2010 showed only 25% of the population trusts the media for accuracy and honesty, and overall confidence in the institution.

    Continue reading on Examiner.com George Soros uses empire to purchase and influence mainstream media – National Finance Examiner | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/finance-examiner-in-national/george-soros-uses-empire-to-purchase-and-influence-mainstream-media#ixzz1U1G34flY

    ————————————————————————————————————————————————————–

    The Koch family of industrialists and businessmen is most notable for their control of Koch Industries, the second largest privately owned company in the United States. The family business was started by Fred C. Koch, who developed a new method for refining heavy oil into gasoline. David and Charles have funded conservative and libertarian policy and advocacy groups in the United States. Since the 1980s the Koch foundations have given more than $100 million to such organizations, among these think tanks like the Heritage Foundation and the Cato Institute, as well as more recently Americans for Prosperity.

    ————————————————————————————————————————————————————

    Keith Rupert Murdoch, (born 11 March 1931) is an Australian-American global media baron and the Chairman and CEO of News Corporation, the world’s second-largest media conglomerate. Murdoch has been listed three times in the Time 100 as among the most influential people in the world. He is ranked 13th most powerful person in the world in the 2010 Forbes’ The World’s Most Powerful People list. With a personal net worth of US$7.6 billion, he was ranked 117th wealthiest person in the world in March 2011.

    ———————————————————————————————————————————————————–

    Gun Owners of America chief Larry Pratt warns that the new “Super Congress” created by the debt deal will lead America into dictatorship, labeling the move a “coup d’état” by the political class aimed at transforming the entire structure of government in the United States.

    Comparing the super committee to Plato’s council, Pratt pointed out that it would take just 34 Senate votes to sustain a bill put forward by the group, noting that it has been set up specifically to prevent lawmakers getting in the way of its agenda by necessitating a super majority to overturn anything introduced by the committee.
    In order to shore up GOP support for a deal to raise the debt ceiling, Senate Democrats are exploring ways of giving the proposed „super Congress“ even greater super powers, according to multiple news reports and congressional aides with knowledge of the plan.

    Under the new proposal, if the new legislative body, made up of six Democrats and six Republicans from both chambers, doesn’t come up with a bill that cuts at least $1.5 trillion by Thanksgiving, entitlement programs will automatically be slashed.

    Under the reported framework, legislation the new congressional committee writes would be fast-tracked through Congress and could not be filibustered or amended.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/31/super-congress-debt-ceiling-deficit-deal_n_914272.html

    —————

    Soros Project Tries to Discredit Fox by Linking It to Alex Jones

    *

    Infowars.com
    August 2, 2011

    Media Matters, a George Soros funded establishment disinfo project, claims Fox News is “moving increasingly toward pushing the conspiratorial views” of Alex Jones. Media Matters made the claim after Fox News picked up an Infowars.com story covering a Department of Homeland propaganda video portraying domestic terrorists as white people. Fox rarely attributes Jones and his websites when it harvests news from them.

    Last month, Fox’s Eric Bolling picked up the Infowars.com story. “We at The Five this morning, we’re looking over some stuff, and this thing came, it hit us right smack in the face.” Echoing the Infowars item, Bolling went on to say that the video shows “white male average Americans end up being the terrorists, and the people calling the terror in happen to be — all of them happen to be black, Asian or Arab,” he said.

    Media Matters claims Glenn Beck has channeled Alex Jones by having G. Edward Griffin on his show. According to Media Matters, Griffin is a conspiracy theorist because he talks about and criticizes the Federal Reserve. Media Matters says Jones is linked to the establishment media operation Fox because he praised Beck and Fox for telling the truth about the Federal Reserve, something the rest of the corporate media strenuously avoids.

    Fox and Beck have since parted ways.

    Soros, the New Democrats, MoveOn.org and their associated “progressive” comrades have made a cottage industry out of attacking Fox News. They aim to destroy the “right-wing” establishment network by linking it to Alex Jones.

    The effort is backfiring. Conflating Beck and Fox with Alex Jones and Griffin drives more people to the websites of Jones and Griffin where they read the truth about the Federal Reserve and the bankers and their plan to decimate the economy and create a global authoritarian government and usher in a neo-feudal system.

    Infowars.com and PrisonPlanet.com have not invented this plot. Aspects are routinely covered by the corporate media – including Fox News – as positive. It only becomes an evil conspiracy theory when Jones and others in the truth movement report it and make obvious conclusions.
    http://www.prisonplanet.com/soros-project-tries-to-discredit-fox-by-linking-it-to-alex-jones.html

    ———————————————————————————-

    Find out more about U.K.’s ban of Michael Savage

    U.K. refuses to lift ban on Savage
    WND

    Savage Savages Obama Over Brit Ban
    Newsmax.com

    Radio hosts ignore Savage ban
    VIN

    Congressman calls for lifting of Britain’s ban on Savage
    WND

    A Savage injustice in Britain
    Peter Schweizer

    England reaffirms ban on radio host Michael Savage
    Jonathan Turley

    The scapegoating of Michael Savage
    Robin of Berkeley

    AUDIO: Savage responds to U.K.’s continued ban
    TRN
    http://www.michaelsavage.wnd.com/2011/06/find-out-more-about-u-k-s-ban-of-michael-savage/

    SAVAGE AUDIO: Beware the government-media complex

    Click here to listen

    http://www.michaelsavage.wnd.com/2011/07/savage-audio-beware-the-government-media-complex/

    Michael Savage proves KOSOVO is SERBIA!

    The Truth About Kosovo and Metohija

  10. […] Michael Savage proves KOSOVO is SERBIA! […]

  11. […] за истину о догађајима у БиХ, Хрватској и на Космету (Michael Savage proves KOSOVO is SERBIA!). Опет, када се изнесе истина, она звучи просрпски, […]

  12. Fantastic goods from you, man. I have consider your stuff previous to
    and you are just extremely great. I actually like
    what you’ve bought right here, really like what you’re saying and the way during which you say it.
    You are making it entertaining and you still
    take care of to keep it smart. I cant wait to read much
    more from you. This is actually a tremendous website.

Оставите одговор

Попуните детаље испод или притисните на иконицу да бисте се пријавили:

WordPress.com лого

Коментаришет користећи свој WordPress.com налог. Одјавите се /  Промени )

Google+ photo

Коментаришет користећи свој Google+ налог. Одјавите се /  Промени )

Слика на Твитеру

Коментаришет користећи свој Twitter налог. Одјавите се /  Промени )

Фејсбукова фотографија

Коментаришет користећи свој Facebook налог. Одјавите се /  Промени )

w

Повезивање са %s

%d bloggers like this: